Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾î¸°ÀÌ ±×¸²¿¡ Åõ»çµÈ Ä¡°úÄ¡·á ºÒ¾ÈÀÇ ºÐ¼®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1995³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.273 ~ 283
¾ç°è½Ä, À̱ԹÌ, ÇöÅ¿¬,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç°è½Ä (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̱Թ̠(  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÇöÅ¿¬ (  ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
¾î¸°ÀÌÀÇ ±×¸² ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ Ä¡°úÁø·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÒ¾Èµµ ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ¿¬±¸Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©, ±¹¹ÎÇб³
2, 3, 4Çг⠾ÀÌ 702¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î '³»°¡ Ä¡°ú¿¡ °¡¼­ Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹Þ´Â ¸ð½À'À» ±×¸®°Ô ÇÏ°í
µ¿½Ã¿¡ ±¸°­°Ë»ç¿Í Ä¡°úÄ¡·á°æÇè¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȸ¼öµÈ ±×¸²À» Sheskin µîÀÇ
Ä¡°úºÒ¾Èôµµ Áß¿¡¼­ 'Ä¡°úÀÇ»ç ¹¦»ç'¸¦ 'Ä¡°úÀÇ»çÀÇ ¹Ì¼Ò ¹¦»ç'·Î, '»ç¿ëÇÑ »öÀÇ ¼ö'¸¦ '¹¦
»çµÈ »ç¶÷ÀÇ ¼ö'·Î ´ëÄ¡ÇÑ 6°³ ºÐ¼®Ç׸ñÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í, Ä¡°úÁø·áºÒ¾ÈµµÀÇ ¼ºº°, ÇÐ
³âº°, ÁÖÁ¦»öº°, Ä¡°úÄ¡·á°æÇ躰 ºÐÆ÷ ¹× Ä¡°úÁø·áºÒ¾Èµµ¿Í ¿ì½Ä°æÇèµµ°£ÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀ» »êÃâÇÏ
°í °¢ ºÐ¼®Ç׸ñº° Æò°¡ µîÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ºÒ¾ÈµµÀÇ Á¡¼öº° ºÐÆ÷´Â ÃÖÀúÄ¡°¡ 0Á¡, ÃÖ°íÄ¡°¡ 6Á¡, Æò±ÕÄ¡°¡ 2.19À̾ú´Ù.
2. ¼ºº° ºÒ¾Èµµ´Â ³²¾Æ°¡ 2.27, ¿©¾Æ°¡ 2.13À̾ú´Ù.
3. Çг⺰ ºÒ¾Èµµ´Â 2ÇгâÀÌ 1.98, 3ÇгâÀÌ 2.30, 4ÇгâÀÌ 2.40À̾ú°í ÀÌ Áß¿¡¼­ 2Çгâ°ú ´Ù
¸¥ ÇгⰣ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.01).
4. ÁÖÁ¦»öº° ºÒ¾Èµµ´Â °ËÀº»öÀÌ 2.50À¸·Î¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ±× ´ÙÀ½ÀÌ °íµ¿»ö(2.37), »¡°£»ö
(2.36), Èò»ö(2.33), ÆĶõ»ö(2.27), ÁÖȲ»ö(2.22), ³ë¶û»ö(2.18), ³ì»ö(2.15), ȲÅä»ö(2.12), ȸ»ö
(2.11), ºÐÈ«»ö(2.08), º¸¶ó»ö(2.03)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
5. Ä¡°úÄ¡·á À¯°æÇèÀÚÀÇ ºÒ¾Èµµ°¡ 2.21À̾ú°í ¹«°æÇèÀÚÀÇ ºÒ¾Èµµ°¡ 2.03À̾ú´Ù.
6. ºÒ¾Èµµ¿Í ¿ì½ÄÄ¡Áö¼ö°£ÀÇ ÇǾ »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â -0.1170(P<0.01)À̾ú°í, ºÒ¾Èµµ¿Í ÃæÀüÄ¡À²
°£ÀÇ ÇǾ »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â 0.0708(P<0.05)À̾ú´Ù.
7. Ç׸ñº° ºÒ¾Èµµ´Â 'Å°'¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ±× ´ÙÀ½ÀÌ '¹Ì¼Ò', '»ý·«', '±â±¸', '»ç¶÷ ¼ö', 'Ä¡
·á»óȲ'ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
8. Àüü ºÒ¾Èµµ¿ÍÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀÌ °¡Àå ÄÇ°í ½Å·Ú°è¼ö¿¡ °¡Àå Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ³¢ÃÆ´ø Ç׸ñÀº '¹Ì¼Ò'
¿Í '»ý·«'À̾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of study was to develop the method of analysis of drawings to assess the
level of anxiety of children for dental treatment. 702 school children from second to
fourth grade drawed pictures representing the dental treatment situation. Caries
experience and dental treatment experience were investigated. Drawings were analyzed
using criteria modified from Dental Anxiety Scale by Sheskin et al. The index 'drawing
of the dentist' was replaced by 'drawing of smile of the dentist' and the index 'number
of colors used' was replaced by 'number of persons drawed'. The results were as
follows :
1. The mean anxiety score was 2.19, and the range was from 0 to 6.00.
2. The anxiety score was 2.27 in boys and 2.13 in girls.
3. The anxiety score was 1.93 in second grade, 2.30 in third grade, and 2.40 in fourth
grade. There were significant difference between second grade and the other
grades(P<0.01).
4. The anxiety score by theme color was 2.50 in black, 2.37 in brown, 2.36 in red, 2.33
in white, 2.22 in orange, 2.18 in yellow, 2.15 in green, 2.12 in ocher yellow, 2.11 in gray,
2.08 in pick, and 2.03 in violet.
5. The anxiety score was 2.21 in treated children and 2.03 in untreated children.
6. Pearson correlation coefficient was -0.1170(P<0.01) between anxiety score and dt
index and 0.0708(P<0.05) between anxiety score and ft rate.
7. The index 'height' was highest in the anxiety score and then 'smile', 'omission',
'instrument', 'number of person', and 'treatment situation' were in order.
8. The indexes 'smile' and 'omission' had the most high correlation with the total
anxiety score.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI